Author

admin

Browsing

Former President Donald Trump cited his assassination attempt during his debate against Vice President Kamala Harris, saying he ‘probably took a bullet to the head’ due to rhetoric from Harris and Democrats. 

‘I probably took a bullet to the head because of the things that they say about me. They talk about democracy. I’m a threat to democracy. They’re the threat to democracy,’ Trump said from the debate stage in Philadelphia on Tuesday evening. 

Trump faced an assassination attempt in July during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. The shooter, Matthew Crooks, shot Trump in the ear, injured two audience members and fatally shot local dad and fireman Corey Comperatore. 

‘This is the one that weaponized, not me,’ Trump said, referring to Harris. ‘She weaponized.’

Trump’s remark that he was shot ‘probably’ due to Democratic rhetoric was followed by Harris saying that Trump would ‘weaponize the Department of Justice’ against his political enemies. 

‘Well, let’s talk about extreme, and understand the context in which this election in 2024 is taking place. The United States Supreme Court recently ruled that the former president would essentially be immune from any misconduct if he were to enter the White House again,’ she said. 

‘Understand, this is someone who has openly said he would terminate, I’m quoting, terminate the Constitution of the United States, that he would weaponize the Department of Justice against his political enemies. Someone who has openly expressed disdain for members of our military. Understand, that it means if Donald Trump were back in the White House with no guard rails, because certainly we know now the court won’t stop him,’ Harris added. 

Trump has since recovered from the assassination attempt, after he was seen wearing a bandage over his ear during the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee just days after the attempt unfolded. 

Trump and Harris joined the same debate stage at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia. The debate marks the first time the pair squared off against one another, following President Biden dropping out of the race amid mounting concerns over his mental acuity. 

Trump has said he will return to Butler County, Pennsylvania, in October for another rally following the attempt. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Vice President Kamala Harris claimed former President Trump would install a national abortion ban that would allow for no exceptions despite Trump saying moments before he believes in exceptions for abortion. 

‘Now, in over 20 states, there are Trump abortion bans, which make it criminal for a doctor or nurse to provide health care in one state. It provides prison for life. Trump abortion bans that make no exception, even for rape and incest, which understand what that means,’ Harris said Tuesday evening from Philadelphia’s National Constitution Center.  

‘A survivor of a crime of violation to their body does not have the right to make a decision about what happens to their body. That is immoral, and one does not have to abandon their faith or deeply held beliefs to agree the government and Donald Trump certainly should not be telling a woman what to do with her body,

‘Understand, if Donald Trump were to be re-elected, he will sign the national abortion ban.’ 

Moments before, Trump said he believes in exceptions for abortion, similar to former President Reagan. 

‘I believe in the exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother,’ Trump said during the debate. ‘I believe strongly in it. Ronald Reagan did also. Eighty-five percent of Republicans knew exceptions are very important,’ he said. 

Trump added in his rebuttal that he does not support a national abortion ban and that Harris’ comments were an ‘absolute lie.’ 

‘As far as the abortion ban, no, I’m not in favor of an abortion ban, but it doesn’t matter, because this issue has now been taken over by the states,’ Trump said. 

The Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, and Trump praised the decision. His campaign says abortion laws and issues should be left up to individual states after the Dobbs decision. 

Earlier this year, Trump drew the condemnation of some pro-life conservatives for the GOP’s more muted language on abortion this election cycle and for saying last month that Florida’s six-week abortion ban ‘is too short.’ He has since said he will vote against a Florida amendment that would legalize abortion through the ninth month of pregnancy and has doubled down that abortion laws and issues should be left up to states to decide. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A voter taking part in the Fox News Digital panel reacting to the debate slammed Vice President Kamala Harris for some of the rhetoric she used against former President Donald Trump.

‘Race baiting and fear mongering was a big part of her tactics tonight,’ one voter on the panel said of Harris’ debate performance.

The comment comes after Trump and Harris squared off in what could be the only debate between the two candidates before election day in November, beginning the stretch run of a campaign that promises to end in a razor tight finish.

But one voter didn’t come away impressed with Harris’ rhetoric.

Asked to point to a specific incident in the debate where Harris was ‘race baiting’ Trump, the voter pointed to her remarks on the ‘Central Park Five.’

‘I think that’s a hot button issue, especially for a lot of African Americans, but she leaves out a lot of specifics to that,’ the voter said, like the lead prosecutor was a Democrat at the time,’ the voter said.

The voter was referencing a part in the debate in which Harris accused Trump of having a long history of being racially divisive, noting that his family’s company was once investigated for allegedly refusing to rent to black people decades ago and mentioning that he called for the death penalty for the Central Park Five, who were falsely accused of raping a Manhattan jogger in 1989.

‘I think he was gaslit throughout the entire debate, and that is probably why he was so defensive,’ the voter said. ‘Even when he brought up the topic of race, he brought that up because she’s pandering, she’s using being black as a trope to get black votes.’

The voter concluded by arguing that Harris never elaborated about a plan for black voters, something she would have liked to hear the vice president speak on.

‘I would have liked to see her lean into the fact that ‘yes I am a black woman, and this is my plan black America,’’ the voter continued. ‘But she clearly doesn’t have a plan because she’s essentially not black.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A Fox News Digital focus group of Republicans, Democrats and Independents used dials to react live to former President Trump’s comments during the 2024 presidential debate Kamala Harris Tuesday, saying that he ‘took a bullet to the head’ because of leftist rhetoric. 

The focus group comprised 7 Democrats, 5 Independents, and 5 Republicans, represented by blue, yellow, and red lines, respectively. 

Trump’s comments about taking a bullet to the head came during discussions about alleged ‘weponization’ of the Department of Justice. 

The Republican nominee contended that it was Harris and the Democrats who had weaponized the DOJ, ‘not me.’ 

At this assertion, the focus participants showed muted responses, with Democrats slightly above. 

‘I probably took a bullet to the head, because of the things that they say about me. They talk about Democracy – I’m a threat to Democracy. They’re a threat to Democracy,’ Trump said. 

With these comments, Republican respondents responded most favorably, as indicated by the red line that shot up. Independents, meanwhile, remained unresponsive, while Democrats dipped slightly downwards. 

‘The fake ‘Russia, Russia, Russia,’ investigation that went nowhere,’ Trump continued, before being cut off by ABC News moderator David Muir. 

Trump narrowly survived an assassination attempt while holding an outdoor rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024. Just minutes into his speech, a gunman perched on a rooftop outside the perimeter of the rally, opened fire on the Republican nominee, and was killed by the Secret Service within seconds. A bullet struck his ear as he stood at the podium. 

The gunman was later identified as 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, whose motives remain unknown. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Kamala Harris and Donald Trump began with their talking points, and she threw the first punches.

Asked at the ABC debate by moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis whether the country was better off than four years ago, the VP said she was ‘raised as a middle-class kid,’ wants to raise up those voters, she wants to tackle the housing shortage, and has a ‘passion’ for small business. Trump’s plan, she said, was to cut taxes for his billionaire friends and big corporations.

The former president started on the high road, talking about the tariffs he imposed on China.

But he soon resorted to personal attacks. ‘Everything she believed four years ago, she’s a Marxist.’

And: ‘She hates Israel.’ If she wins, ‘Israel will not exist in two years.’

Trump also said of Joe Biden, without substantiation, ‘He hates her. He can’t stand her.’

Trump pushed a completely debunked rumor that Haitians in Springfield, Ohio, ‘they’re eating the dogs, they’re eating the pets.’ Muir said the city manager confirmed there were no such reports.

Trump looked angrier as the debate wore on, with Harris at one point laughing at him. She pivoted between looking at him and the cameras; he barely glanced at her.

‘We did a phenomenal job with the pandemic,’ Trump said, which is, well, debatable.  

Harris grew most animated when asked about abortion, and declared that Trump would sign a national abortion ban. 

‘You’re going to hear a bunch of lies,’ the veep said. Pregnant women were being denied emergency care, a 12-year old survivor of incest was forced to carry the baby to term. 

Trump said, as he did to me at Mar-a-Lago, that ‘every legal scholar’ wanted the abortion issue returned to the states. That is not true.

Trump said the Democrats are the radicals because they support abortion through the ninth month, and quoted a dumb comment by the former Virginia governor about making a decision after birth, which is illegal.

‘This is so rich by someone who has been found liable for sexual assault,’ Harris said, referring to the E. Jean Carroll case and rattling off various indictments.

That’s because the administration has ‘weaponized’ law enforcement against him, Trump said in an oft-repeated charge. He added, without substantiation, ‘They’re the ones who made them go after me.’

In another charge without evidence, the ex-president accused Harris of ‘paying people’ to attend her rallies.

Referring to the attempted assassination, Trump said, ‘I probably took a bullet to the head because of their rhetoric.’ Then he said ‘Russia Russia Russia’ – the kind of shorthand that may have puzzled casual viewers.

Harris also said things that weren’t true. She said she made clear in 2020 that she was not against fracking, but what she actually said was that Biden would not ban fracking. She said he had threatened a ‘bloodbath’ if he loses, but he actually said that about the American auto industry.

ABC pressed Trump about Jan. 6, asking why he didn’t make the video earlier asking protestors to go home. He said what was left out was that in his speech he had asked the demonstrators to be ‘peaceful and patriotic.’

Harris countered that Trump had ‘incited a violent mob’ in which 150 law enforcement officials were injured, and ‘some died.’

ABC did press Harris on her past opposition to fracking and for abolishing private health insurance, but she stuck to varying versions of ‘my values haven’t changed.’

On another crucial issue, ABC asked twice: ‘Do you want Ukraine to win this war?’ Trump would not say yes. ‘I want the war to stop,’ he said. ‘I think it’s in the U.S.’s best interest to get this war done, negotiate a deal.’

Harris responded: ‘If Donald Trump were president, Putin would be sitting in Kyiv right now.’ She said she met with Volodomyr Zelenskyy days before the invasion to share U.S. intelligence.

My scorecard:

Kamala Harris did everything she could have reasonably done to brush off Trump’s attacks, make her case, and repeatedly attack him while largely maintaining her composure.

Trump turned in a strong performance and landed numerous blows, but Harris increasingly got under his skin rather than the other way around.

ABC tilted against Trump, with a series of tougher questions, more followups, more fact-checking, and more corrections by the network. This vindicated Trump’s pregame criticism of ABC as the ‘meanest’ network.

Now the partisan spinning gets under way in earnest.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Former President Trump brought up one of Vice President Kamala Harris’ most memorable debate lines Tuesday night when he told her to ‘wait a minute’ and said ‘I’m talking now’ during a debate exchange. 

‘She gave up at least 12 and probably 14 or 15 different policies, like she was big on defund the police,’ Trump said before it appeared VP Harris attempted to say something. 

‘Wait a minute, I’m talking now,’ Trump shot back. ‘If you don’t mind, please. Does that sound familiar?’

Trump was referencing a debate moment between VP candidates Harris and Mike Pence when she told Pence ‘I’m speaking’ during a 2020 vice presidential debate when he was attempting to talk over her. 

At the time, critics of Harris suggested the quote was an attempt to create a viral moment.

The Harris and Trump campaigns went back and forth in the weeks leading up to the debate about whether the microphones should be muted for the candidate not speaking during the debate. Ultimately, the decision was made to mute the mics.  

The moment was noticed by conservatives on social media, including commentator Dana Loesch who remarked on X, ‘Good quip.’

‘She went out in Minnesota and wanted to let criminals that killed people that burned down Minneapolis,’ Trump said immediately after asking Harris to let him finish speaking. ‘She went out and raised money to get them out of jail. She did things that nobody would ever think of. Now she wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in prison.’

Trump is maintaining his lead nationally, seemingly shrugging off a burst of enthusiasm for Democrats after Harris entered the race, according to recent polling.

Trump garnered the support of 48% of likely voters, compared to 47% who indicated support for Harris, according to the latest results of a New York Times/Siena poll released Sunday.

Fox News Digital’s Brian Flood and Michael Lee contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Voters taking part in a Fox News Digital panel reacting to the debate said that Vice President Kamala Harris came away from the event with a victory.

Asked who they thought won the debate, 12 voters on the panel raised their hand for Harris while just five indicated they believed former President Donald Trump won.

Asked why they thought Harris won, many voters expressed that Trump did not know how to attack his new opponent in the race.

‘He is still in his head basically trying to run against Joe Biden,’ one voter said.

Another voter knocked Trump for not bringing fresh ideas to the stage.

‘Trump was so bad, he’s just like an old suit from like 1987 right now. He just repeats himself, says the same stuff, and she’s refreshing in that she’s different,’ the voter said. ‘I think if he had a different line of attack with her, it would have been more effective.’

‘I think she won the debate from my perspective, because he was so bad and he just sounds so repetitive, but I think she’s weak. She’s weak on the substance and she’s weak on the facts,’ the voter added.

But the panel didn’t provide only good news for Harris, with few of those participating saying that the vice president met their expectations.

‘She wasn’t very specific when asked certain things,’ one voter said. ‘She knows how to pull at your heartstrings. She knows how to be dramatic in a way that will touch the heart of Americans while avoiding the hot button questions.’

The debate may be the only one between the two candidates before election day in November, coming after President Biden’s disastrous debate performance earlier this year that helped launch a movement to force him out of the election and just 56 days until most voters cast their ballots.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Former President Donald Trump’s top allies are rushing to declare victory after his debate against Vice President Kamala Harris on Tuesday night.

GOP lawmakers are touting a Trump win even as they criticize ABC News moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis for their handling of the debate, accusing them of acting with bias against the ex-president.

‘President Trump delivered a powerful America First message directly to the American people focusing on reining in inflation and strengthening our economy, securing our border, and peace through strength foreign policy,’ House GOP Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., said in a statement at the tail end of the debate.

‘The ABC moderators were not journalists, they were pro-Kamala activists who baselessly attacked President Trump leading to a 3 on 1 debate, while allowing Kamala to lie repeatedly. President Trump won overwhelmingly and will win again on Election Day.’

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said Trump ‘exposed’ Harris as a ‘radical’ despite her seeking to reflect more moderate positions on firearm ownership and the border at times.

‘While Harris lied about her radical positions and spoke about things she would supposedly do as president, and despite the biased moderators shamelessly covering for Harris, there are two problems that Americans were reminded of in prime-time: she has a lifelong record as a Marxist, and she’s the sitting Vice President who could secure the border and bring down costs today,’ Johnson said.

Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, similarly told Fox News host Sean Hannity, ‘The moderators didn’t do their job, but President Trump did do his job.’

Senate GOP Conference Chair John Barrasso, R-Wyo., wrote on X, ‘President Trump tonight shared his strong vision to reverse the high prices and open borders of the Biden-Harris administration. He articulated a plan to unleash American energy and to get our country back on track.’

Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-Texas, Trump’s former White House physician, said the ex-president ‘just DESTROYED Kamala Harris on national television and EXPOSED her administration for the harm it caused!!’

Meanwhile, Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., said on X at the end of the debate, ‘Joe Biden set the bar low enough to bunny hop over it and she still somehow managed to limbo underneath.’

However, not all Republicans agreed it was a clear victory for Trump. One GOP lawmaker, granted anonymity to speak freely, told Fox News Digital that Harris appeared to be getting under Trump’s skin.

‘She talks to us like toddlers but is doing a good job of provoking him,’ the GOP lawmaker said during the debate. ‘He’s right on policy but can’t keep to a message.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The gold spot price is used globally when the precious metal is traded. Constantly in a state of flux, the gold price is driven by diverse factors, from safe-haven demand to futures market speculation.

For much of human history, gold has been looked to as a symbol of wealth. The yellow metal emerged as a desirable commodity as far back as 4000 BCE in Egypt. In 2600 BCE, Mesopotamian artisans began crafting gold jewelry to adorn royal elites. By 700 BCE, humans were using gold coins in the first monetary transactions.

In modern times, gold is not only recognized as a sign of affluence or a safe place to store value, but has also become a popular investment vehicle for generating wealth.

Today, gold can be traded in physical forms such as gold bullion coins and bars, as well as via paper trades such as gold futures, gold exchange-traded funds and gold stocks.

Physical gold transactions are tied to the spot price for gold, while gold paper trades play a role in determining that price. Read on for more information on the gold spot price and why it’s important.

What is the gold spot price?

The gold spot price represents the current purchase price of a troy ounce of the precious metal for immediate delivery. The spot price for gold is typically used in gold bullion transactions, with trading activity taking place in numerous financial hubs around the world, from Hong Kong to New York to London to Delhi. This global scale means that the spot gold market is open somewhere in the world 23 hours a day, Sunday through Friday.

Investors who are new to gold trading often assume that the spot price is the only way prices are set for the yellow metal. However, there is a difference between the spot price and prices for gold futures.

Whereas in the spot market the gold purchased is intended for immediate delivery, in the futures market gold is sold in a contract with a delivery date sometime in the future at a predetermined price. Known as the futures price, this value is often higher than the spot price for gold.

How is the gold spot price determined?

The spot price of a troy ounce of gold is determined by over-the-counter trading, where prices are negotiated between buyer and seller. When you look at the gold spot price on a site like Kitco, you will see high and low values. These represent the highest ask price and the lowest bid for that day.

As per Kitco, ‘For larger transactions, most precious metals traders will use a benchmark price that is taken at specific periods during the trading day.’ These benchmark prices, known as gold fixes, are typically set twice a day and are based partly on what’s happening in the gold spot market and partly on activity in the gold futures market.

The London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) leads the way in setting the benchmark price for gold, as well as the silver price. The pricing mechanism for the LBMA Gold Price, dubbed the London Fix, is linked to electronic auctions between 13 member banks, including the Bank of China (HKEX:3988), Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS), HSBC Bank USA, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM) and Toronto-Dominion Bank (TSX:TD,NYSE:TD).

The LBMA Gold Price is in turn tied to the electronic trading of gold futures on the COMEX, part of CME Group (NASDAQ:CME). ‘The spot gold price is calculated using data from the front month futures contract traded on the COMEX,’ according to gold dealer JM Bullion. ‘If the front month contract has little to no volume, then the next delivery month with the most volume will be utilized.’

The front month refers to the month nearest to the current date. The gold spot price is technically an average net present value of the estimated future price of gold based on traded futures contracts and the nearest month.

Gold spot price history

As with any commodities market, the price of gold can change dramatically on surges in supply and demand. Gold is also particularly sensitive to geopolitical risks, social upheaval and stock market shakeups. Headline news events to that effect can result in dramatic swings in the spot price for gold.

A look at gold’s price history over the past 30 years shows that the precious metal does especially well during times of uncertainty as investors look for safe-haven investments.

Steady economic growth in the mid-1990s led to a drastic decline in the gold price, which slid from around US$410 per ounce to about US$288. But during the 2008 financial crisis, gold’s safe-haven status became increasingly apparent as the metal spiked to US$869.75.

The spot price for gold would later reach more than US$1,900 on September 5, 2011, as investors grew increasingly concerned that the US would default on its debt; at the time that was gold’s highest price ever.

In the following decade, the gold spot price saw peaks and troughs. Halfway through 2013, tit took a dive to the US$1,220 level, and it remained between US$1,100 and US$1,300 from 2014 to early 2019.

Since then, it has more than doubled. This began in the second half of 2019, when a weaker US dollar, increasing geopolitical tensions and slowing economic growth sent gold prices above US$1,500.

In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic threw the global economy into a tailspin, with the gold price adding more than US$500 to its value in the first eight months of the year, breaking US$2,000 for the first time.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and continued economic uncertainty lent a hand to gold in early 2022, pulling the yellow metal up to a then-record price of US$2,074.60 in March. However, it plummeted through much of the year to below US$1,650. 2023 was stronger for gold on the back of banking instability, high interest rates and the breakout of war in the Middle East.

2024 has been a strong year for the gold spot price, which has broken through multiple fresh levels throughout the year on fears of a looming US recession, the promise of Fed rate cuts on the horizon and the worsening conflict in the Middle East and the US election.

By mid-March, gold broke through the US$2,200 level, in April it moved above US$2,400 and in early August it broke through US$2,500 for the first time, hitting a new high of US$2,530 later that month.

Learn more about the gold spot price

Ready to build your gold spot price knowledge? For a deeper dive into the mechanics of gold’s price movements, check out our article Follow the Money: A Guide to Gold Technical Analysis.

How high could the gold spot price go? In the past few years, gold market analysts have put forth eyebrow-raising gold price forecasts. Will the price of gold break the US$3,000 level? Will gold push past US$4,000 to US$5,000? Could US$8,000 or even US$10,000 gold become a reality sometime in the near future?

Securities Disclosure: I, Melissa Pistilli, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

(TheNewswire)

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada September 10, 2024 TheNewswire JZR Gold Inc. (the ‘ Company ‘ or ‘ JZR ‘) ( TSX-V: JZR ) is pleased to announce that further to news releases dated June 21, 2024, July 22, 2024, and August 16, 2024, that it has closed the second and final tranche of the previously announced non-brokered private placement offering (the ‘ Offering ‘) of unsecured convertible debentures (the ‘ Debentures ‘). The Company requested and received acceptance from the TSX Venture Exchange (the ‘ Exchange ‘) to increase the Offering to up to CAD$2 million. The principal sum of Debentures issued in the second tranche totals $480,000, for total gross proceeds from the Offering of $1,980,000.

The Debentures will mature on the date that is one (1) year from the date of issuance (the ‘ Maturity Date ‘) and shall bear simple interest at a rate of 10% per annum, payable on the Maturity Date.  The principal sum of the Debentures, or any portion thereof, and any interest may be converted into units (the ‘ Units ‘) of the Company at a conversion price of $0.20 per Unit.  Each Unit shall be comprised of one common share (a ‘ Conversion Share ‘) and one share purchase warrant (a ‘ Warrant ‘).  Each Warrant shall entitle the holder to acquire one additional common share (a ‘ Warrant Share ‘) in the capital of the Company at a price of $0.25 per share for a period of twenty-four (24) months from the date that the Warrants are issued.

The Debentures, Units, Conversion Shares, Warrants and Warrant Shars are collectively referred to herein as the ‘ Securities ‘.  In connection with the second tranche of the Offering, the Company paid cash finder’s fees of $14,700 and issued 73,500 non-transferable broker warrants being 6% of the gross proceeds raised from persons introduced by the finder. The broker warrants have an exercise price of $0.20 with an expiry date of three (3) years from the date of issuance. Other than the exercise price and expiry date, the Finders’ Warrants shall otherwise be on the same terms as the Warrants.

All Debentures issued pursuant to the Offering, including any securities into which they may be exercised or converted, are subject to a statutory hold period of four months and one day from the date of issuance thereof.  The Offering is subject to final acceptance by the Exchange.

The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Offering to: (i) fund operations of the fully constructed 800 tonne-per-day gravimetric mill, as well as future exploration work on the Vila Nova Gold project located in Amapa State, Brazil (the ‘ Vila Nova Project ‘), (ii) to pay certain liabilities owed to arm’s length parties and (iii) for general working capital purposes. The Company may fund operations on the Vila Nova Gold project by advancing fu nds, by way of one or more loans, to ECO Mining Oil & Gaz Drilling and Exploration (EIRELI) (‘ ECO ‘), as operator of the Vila Nova Project. The Company possesses a 50% net profit interest from all net profit generated from the Vila Nova Project.

For further information, please contact:

Robert Klenk

Chief Executive Officer

E: rob@jazzresources.ca
T: 604.329.9092

Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains forward-looking statements, which includes any information about activities, events or developments that the Company believes, expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future.  Forward-looking statements in this news release include statements with respect to respect to the details of the Offering, including the proposed size, timing and the anticipated use of net proceeds, the receipt of regulatory approval for the Offering, the potential loan of funds to ECO and the expected operation of the gravimetric mill on the Vila Nova property.  Forward-looking information reflects the expectations or beliefs of management of the Company based on information currently available to it.  Forward-looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information.  These factors include, but are not limited to: risks associated with the business of the Company; business and economic conditions in the mineral exploration industry generally; the supply and demand for labour and other project inputs; changes in commodity prices; changes in interest and currency exchange rates; risks related to inaccurate geological and engineering assumptions; risks relating to unanticipated operational difficulties (including failure of equipment or processes to operate in accordance with the specifications or expectations, unavailability of materials and equipment, government action or delays in the receipt of government approvals, industrial disturbances or other job action and unanticipated events related to health, safety and environmental matters); risks related to adverse weather conditions; geopolitical risk and social unrest; changes in general economic conditions or conditions in the financial markets; and other risk factors as detailed from time to time in the Company’s continuous disclosure documents filed with the Canadian securities regulators.  The forward-looking information contained in this press release is expressly qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement.  The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except as required by applicable securities laws.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its regulation services provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release.

None of the securities of JZR have been registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘U.S. Securities Act’), or any state securities law, and may not be offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, persons in the United States or ‘U.S. persons’ (as such term is defined in Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act) absent registration or an exemption from such registration requirements. This news release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy in the United States nor shall there be any sale of the securities in any State in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful.

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWSWIRE SERVICES OR FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION OR DISSEMINATION, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN OR INTO THE UNITED STATES.

Copyright (c) 2024 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.

News Provided by TheNewsWire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com